back to top
Thursday, January 9, 2025

Intention versus Perception: In the Eritrean Political Context

Introduction: Judging or casting judgment on an individual, group, or entity is a fundamental aspect of human behavior. We all form opinions and perspectives based on our observations. However, the methodology behind forming these judgments varies widely among individuals. Some take the time to meticulously analyze a situation before articulating their thoughts, while others may hastily form opinions, driven more by emotion than by thorough analysis. I, too, sometimes find myself in this position, especially when attempting to set aside political considerations. It’s simpler to base judgments on emotions rather than dedicating time to deliberate observation. This is a pitfall we must all be conscious of and strive to avoid.

When I encounter this dilemma, I often reflect on why certain groups react the way they do. I came to realize that your intentions are internal, personal, and known only to you. However, the perception of your intentions is external, and the responsibility lies with those observing you to comprehend what you are attempting to achieve.

The Issue: In 2020, a profound rift emerged within the Eritrean political landscape as factions of the opposition became divided over whether to support the Tigray Defense Forces (TDF) during the Tigray conflict or to set aside political differences and rally behind the Eritrean Defense Forces in response to the missile attack launched by the TDF on Asmara. This schism led to a transformation in strategy among some prominent opposition figures, who began to reconsider their approach to opposing the Eritrean government, seeking to build bridges with more government-leaning Eritreans. Consequently, these individuals were branded as “traitors,” “slaves,” and subjected to other derogatory labels by segments of the opposition, suggesting that they had forsaken their core values and principles.

Undeniably, some Eritreans who once opposed the government have now shifted to supporting it, which can be perceived as counterproductive in the quest for reform. This shift often originates from a loss of confidence in the opposition. While I can comprehend this stance, I do not endorse it. It is essential to evolve your approach to achieving social, political, and economic change in the country rather than abandoning your fundamental values.

For Eritreans who once opposed the government but are now advocating for unity and diplomacy, they have not relinquished their core values, and many have made this abundantly clear. However, when a strategy has been employed repeatedly for years, if not decades, without success, doesn’t it make sense to reassess your approach to attaining your objectives? It’s crucial to remember that all Eritrean opposition groups operate from outside the country, serving more as pressure groups than political parties, which would otherwise directly influence the quality of life for Eritreans. Frequently, the pressure exerted on Eritrea regarding its human rights, political, and economic situation backfires, transforming into political ammunition for the government.

Conclusion and Solution: You can always dissent from someone’s approach to problem-solving, but condemning an individual who alters their strategy without first evaluating whether they’ve compromised their principles is purely an emotional reaction. I recognize that emotions can obscure our ability to assess Eritrean politics objectively, given the country’s history and the poor decisions made by the government over time. However, meaningful change will arise from creating a forum where Eritreans from both the government and the opposition can meet halfway, exchange ideas, and find common ground. What has been fragmented cannot be the same as what was once united. True progress will emerge from unity. In short, national reconciliation and candid discussions about Eritrea’s past, coupled with strategies for addressing its challenges and moving forward, are indispensable.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions titled "Intention versus Perception: In the Eritrean Political Context", are those of Daniel Mulugeta and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Setit Media. ኣብዚ "Intention versus Perception: In the Eritrean Political Context", ዘርእስቱ ጽሑፍ ተገሊጹ ዘሎ ርእይቶን ሓሳብን ናይ Daniel Mulugeta እምበር መትከላትን መርገጽን ሰቲት ሚዲያ ዘንጸባርቕ ኣይኮነን።

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

eighteen − four =

Stay Connected

7,377FansLike
752FollowersFollow
22,400SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles